Why is the Quran not copied from the Bible?
The Quran and the Bible are among the most prominent religious scriptures in the world. They both claim to be God's word, but with over a billion Muslims following the Quran and billions of Christians following the Bible, it is reasonable to investigate the parallels and contrasts between the two scriptures. In this article, we will look at historical, linguistic, and scientific evidence to show that the Quran cannot be reproduced from the Bible.
Historical Evidence.
One of the most compelling justifications for the Quran's originality is its origin. The Quran was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in the seventh century CE, almost 600 years after the Bible was completed. This means that any copying of the Quran from the Bible would have had to have place during this time period, which is extremely unlikely given the significant discrepancies between the books.
Furthermore, the Quran contains comprehensive historical narratives that prove its legitimacy. It mentions notable persons, events, and locations from the Middle East, providing useful insights into the region's history and culture at the time. The Bible, on the other hand, does not contain the same level of historical detail, bolstering the notion that the Quran is not a copy of the Bible.
Linguistic Evidence
The languages employed in the Quran and the Bible likewise differ greatly. The Quran was revealed in Arabic, and the Bible was written in a variety of languages such as Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Any reproduction of the Quran from the Bible would necessitate a thorough comprehension of these languages and the capacity to appropriately interpret the text.
Furthermore, there are linguistic differences between the Quran and the Bible. The Quran features unique terms and phrases that cannot be found in the Bible. This implies that the Quran is not derived from the Bible, but rather an independent revelation from God.
Scientific Evidence
The Quran and the Bible both mention scientific miracles. The Quran contains explicit data concerning several natural events, including the creation of the heavens and earth, the formation of the human embryo, and the laws of gravity. These scientific miracles were known to individuals at the time the Quran was revealed, confirming the text's veracity.
In contrast, the Bible includes scientific errors that were eventually remedied. For example, contemporary science has disputed the Bible's description of the sun moving across the sky. These inconsistencies support the claim that the Quran was revealed with knowledge that was not available at the time, rather than being a copy of the Bible.
In conclusion, the convincing evidence offered in this essay supports the claim that the Quran is not a copy of the Bible. The historical, linguistic, and scientific contrasts between the Quran and the Bible demonstrate its uniqueness and divine inspiration. Millions of Muslims around the world continue to follow the Quran as a divine revelation. As a result, its legitimacy and infallibility remain unquestionable.